Related%20passage for Eruvin 138:19

היו שנים אוסרין זה על זה פשיטא לא צריכא דהדר חד מינייהו ובטיל ליה לחבריה מהו דתימא לישתרי קמ"ל דכיון דבעידנא דבטיל לא הוה ליה שריותא בהאי חצר:

Here we are dealing with the case of a tenant who renounced his right to his courtyard but not his right to his house, the Rabbis<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The anonymous author of this part of our Mishnah who differs from R. Eliezer's ruling (supra 26b) that a tenant's renunciation of his share in a courtyard implies ipso facto his renunciation of his right to his house.');">⁴³</span> being of the opinion that a tenant who renounces his right to his courtyard does not ipso facto renounce his right to his house, since a person might well live in a house that has no courtyard. BUT THEIR HOUSES ARE PERMITTED BOTH TO HIM AND TO THEM.

Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 138:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.